I find that
https://www.doi2bib.org/#/doi
works very well for single citations.
On 2021-09-23 19:46 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 23 Sep 2021, at 19:36, Trevor Jenkins <bslwann...@gmail.com> wrote:
Downloaded the (auto-generated) citation from
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003763
The import into BibDesk was successful but the TeX Preview breaks
with various error depending upon what fields are “adjusted”.
Regards, Trevor.
<>< Re: deemed!
That is more a question about tex generation. If the data is
problematic for the tex generation, you should update the data. That
is the main function of the tex preview: to check that it is valid for
tex. So I am not precisely sure what your question is.
Christiaan
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
e...@lisse.na / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply
Book your Covid-10 Vaccination at https://c19.idtoday.com.na
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
