I am sure it used to work but then it means the root cause would be the loss of date-added in my items… mmhmmm… I don’t see anything I did that could have had that result…
> On 18 Sep 2024, at 10:58, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote: > > That’s correct, the “is today” condition only has a start date for the range, > and that always matches for a missing date as I said, and it always did, so > this will include the item. So nothing has changed, I think you remember > incorrectly. > > Essentially, current;y a missing date is interpreted as “now”. However I have > changed this for the next release to be interpreted as “long ago”, which > probably is more appropriate. > > Note that for items added in BibDesk there should never be a missing > date-added, except perhaps for items that were added a very long time ago. > > Christiaan > >> On 18 Sep 2024, at 02:49, Luc Bourhis via Bibdesk-users >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Here is a screen capture. >> >> <Screenshot 2024-09-18 at 02.48.31.png> >> >>> On 17 Sep 2024, at 16:16, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Are you sure you are talking about the date-added? There has not changed >>> anything for many years for this, the filters work just the same as they >>> have done since 2006. >>> >>> There was a bug fix in 1.9.4 with the modified-date, where we erroneously >>> compared the date-added instead for some functions. Perhaps this is what >>> you are thinking of? >>> >>> Apart from that, I don’t see what you describe. What kind of condition do >>> you use? When I use a condition with a date range, I see that a missing >>> date-added is not included in the smart group. What I see is that a start >>> date is always considered true, and an end date is always false when a >>> date-added is missing. Tris has always been the case. Perhaps this logic >>> may not be the best though. >>> >>> Christiaan >>> >>>> On 17 Sep 2024, at 13:09, Luc Bourhis via Bibdesk-users >>>> <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I use Smart Folders with different ranges of date-added. It used to work >>>> fine but I have just noticed that Bibdesk 1.9.5 treats missing date-added >>>> as matching ones. This might have started in earlier versions: I did not >>>> pay attention. By “missing”, I mean that the column “Added” in the central >>>> list display has an empty entry. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Luc J Bourhis > > _______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
_______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
