Hi Joseph, > Hello, Manuel, > > I think we should hold off applying the MinGW socket changes and release > Bigloo4.1a without them. This will give us the necessary testing time to > prove out the changes before the next Bigloo release. In addition, we > may be able to simplify the implementation assuming features found in > Vista and above. > > If people really need 4.1a to compile on MinGw, we can provide the > patches with the warning that the socket changes have not been > completely vetted. Good. We share the same opinion. Let's do it this way.
Thanks again. -- Manuel
