MS wrote, 2017-01-04: > Hi Sven, > > Happy new year! > >> I have 21 benchmarks results for the current beta version >> (bigloo4.3a-beta07Dec16.tar.gz), with gcc 6.2.0 from Ubuntu 16.10: >> >> i386 257016.0 430 760 1750 200 1090 1220 430 1690 870 950 >> 5750 930 920 950 1250 10 830 1180 8850 1820 AVG >> x86-64 -17.7 -13.1 -26.7 -12.5 0.1 -18.7 -24.5 -4.4 -46.9 -18.7 4.3 >> -18.8 -37.4 -15.8 -4.8 -16.0 0.1 -24.0 -1.4 -19.6 -32.6 -16.5 >> x32 -26.2 -16.8 -31.5 -16.5 -5.0 -25.4 -38.5 -4.4 -47.7 -44.2 -15.3 >> -18.0 -41.1 -28.8 -8.6 -34.6 0.1 -32.5 -37.8 -27.1 -32.6 -25.6 >> >> x32 refers to the x32 ABI, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI >> >> The first benchmark is my own GC-intensive application, >> the following 20 benchmarks are the ones from bglstone. >> >> The x32 ABI is a clear winner! > Very interesting indeed. Just to be sure I fully understand your experiment. > I presume that all these tests have been executed using the same machine.
Yes. > I understand the comparison between x86-64 and x32 but I'm not sure about > i386. How did you measure the i386 performance? What do they correspond to? i386 corresponds to a 32-bit bigloo installation on the same 64-bit computer, e.g. by using -m32 -Wa,-32 for gcc. Ciao Sven
