Hello,
I can see why the behavior is occurring, but it seems that, since we are using
symbols for the field specifiers in the instantiate macro and they can be
rewritten by other macros introducing possibly colliding bindings, it makes
uses of the instantiate macros in other macros very fragile. Am I a missing
something? Would it make since to use keywords for the field names instead?
Thank You,Joe
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: Bent Phillipsen <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [bigloo] Fw: Macro Question
Hi Bent,
> IMO this is expected behavior - but doesn't work, as the variable in let
> will be generated:
I have missed the point you are raising in my previous answer. I think you
are right.
--
Manuel
