On 09/09/2011 09:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Sorry if I am missing something, but why exactly a re-vote would be needed?
> Any references to bylaws dictating it? ;)
>
>   Cos
>

That was a question, not an affirmation :)
People have voted on something which is different than what Andrew want
to propose. So I am not sure their votes would still apply. Or does that
mean we can start a vote, have some people voting and then change the
terms of the vote and still apply the votes for the previous proposal?

The vote is now closed and I am about to count votes. So any additional
information is welcome.

Reply via email to