I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4510 to handle this. Please leave a comment there on what of the two approaches would be desirable by HBase?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: > Ted, > > (-general@) > > This is due to some renames carried out and backported from > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1620. I will file HBASE > jiras appropriately for this (or is there one already?). > > I wasn't aware that the non public symbols were being used downstream. > But nothing should be broken beyond a few renames. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> Minor correction to Todd's report, currently HBase TRUNK doesn't compile >> against 0.23 ( >> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23/42/console >> ): >> >> [ERROR] >> /home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/FSHDFSUtils.java:[35,38] >> cannot find symbol >> [ERROR] symbol : class FSConstants >> [ERROR] location: package org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol >> [ERROR] >> >> Cheers >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Just an update from the HBase side: I've run some cluster tests on >>> HDFS 0.23 (as of about a month ago) and it generally works well. >>> Performance for some workloads is ~2x due to HDFS-941, and can be >>> improved a bit more if I finish HDFS-2080 in time. I did not do >>> extensive failure testing (to stress the new append/sync code) but I >>> do plan to do that in the coming months. >>> >>> HBase trunk can compile against 0.23 by using -Dhadoop23 on the maven >>> build. Currently some 15 or so tests are failing - the following HBase >>> JIRA tracks those issues: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4254 >>> >>> (these may be indicative of HDFS side bugs) >>> >>> Any help there from the community would be appreciated! >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi Arun! >>> > >>> > Thanks for the quick reply! >>> > >>> > I'm sorry if I had too many questions in my original email, but I can't >>> find >>> > an answer to my "integration tests" question. Could you, please, share >>> > a URL with us where I can find out more about them? >>> > >>> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> # We made changes to Pig - rather we got help from the Pig team, >>> particularly Daniel. >>> >> >>> >> So, we plan to work through the rest of the stack - Hive, Oozie etc. >>> very soon and we'll >>> >> depend on updated releases from the individual projects. >>> > >>> > Do we have any kinds of commitment from downstream projects as far as >>> those >>> > updates are concerned? Are they targeting these changes as part of point >>> (patch) >>> > release of an already released version (like Pig 0.9.X for example) or >>> > will it be >>> > part of a brand new major release? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Roman. >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> > > > > -- > Harsh J > -- Harsh J
