It doesn't look like you have java-6-sun on your machine. Try setting your
JAVA_HOME to /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk

- Sridhar

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Anand L Ranganathan
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I am getting following error when I build  "sudo make hadoop-apt" .
> I set the JAVA_HOME path correctly and couldn't figureout why it is
> throwing this exception.
>
>      [exec] checking for JNI_GetCreatedJavaVMs in -ljvm... no
>     [exec] checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
>     [exec] checking stdio.h usability... yes
>     [exec] checking stdio.h presence... yes
>     [exec] checking for stdio.h... yes
>     [exec] checking stddef.h usability... yes
>     [exec] checking stddef.h presence... yes
>     [exec] checking for stddef.h... yes
>     [exec]
>
> /home/analog/bigtop_src/bigtop/trunk/output/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.205.0/src/native/configure:
> line 20185: test: !=: unary operator expected
>     [exec] checking jni.h usability... no
>     [exec] checking jni.h presence... no
>     [exec] checking for jni.h... no
>     [exec] configure: error: Native java headers not found. Is $JAVA_HOME
> set correctly?
>
>
> My JAVA_HOME  is set to /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
>
>
> I tried to find the correct java installation on my machine  using
>  "*apt-file
> search jni.h*" . It resulted other java paths than sun java .
>
>  apt-file search jni.h
> classpath-common: /usr/include/classpath/jni.h
> gcc-snapshot:
> /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5.0/include/jni.h
> gcc-snapshot: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.5-snap/include/jni.h
> gcj-4.4-jdk: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4/include/jni.h
> gcj-4.4-jdk: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4/include/jni.h
> kompozer-dev: /usr/include/kompozer/java/jni.h
> kompozer-dev: /usr/include/kompozer/jni.h
> libgcj9-dev: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3/include/jni.h
> openjdk-6-jdk: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/jni.h
> thunderbird-dev: /usr/include/thunderbird-3.0.4/stable/jni.h
> thunderbird-dev: /usr/include/thunderbird-3.0.4/unstable/jni.h
>
> Thanks
> Anand
>

Reply via email to