On 02/04/2012 04:03 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/03/2012 06:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >>> Great stuff! >>> >>> Do this mean that we'd want Mahout 0.6 in Bigtop 0.3.0? >>> >> >> That sounds reasonable. >> Do you see any reason not to? > > My main concern is stability. And I'm not talking rock solid here, > but rather a stream of patch release that could follow 0.6. The > trouble is -- Mahout is one of the few projects into which I have > absolutely no insight into :-( > > Thanks, > Roman.
A cursory test (ie. running examples) worked for me. But let's run the tests we have. That's what they are for :)
