On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> Changing threads: Owen, please don't reply in the VOTE thread with >> anything but a clearly spelled out vote. It helps us to keep discussion >> separate from the voting process. Thanks. > > It was clearly relevant. I was saying that I don't think the proposed > contents is an appropriate release. The discussion is part of the vote > and shouldn't be short-circuited by pulling it into a separate thread.
Then, you are entitled to express your opinion as a -0 or -1. Please attach a short explanation and I will make sure to attach it to the vote tally. Thank you. >> The discussion on the incubator general has established that there's >> absolutely no issue with including *code* that supports Hue into the >> Bigtop source tree. > > That was never the concern. The concern is that Bigtop is planning to > package and distribute a project that isn't an Apache project. That > hasn't been resolved at all and Bigtop can't reasonably release > including Hue until it is. This will likely hold up any Bigtop release > that tries to include Hue. As I said this is not the place to discuss this. The incubator general and perhaps some other ASF aliases where policies are discussed is. If you feel passionate about your opinion -- feel free to take it over there and try to persuade the majority. ASF works by consensus. So far you seem to have failed to generate any. If that changes -- I'll be the first one to comply. Thanks, Roman.
