I don't know what the rules are for a BOM vote. It seems close to a release vote, which would indicate a -1 is not a veto (ie it's a majority vote).
However, continuing down this path we'll end up with a -1 from Owen when it comes time to release 0.4. Releases are majority votes, but the rest of the IPMC is going to take a long hard look if you have a -1 from one of your mentors. I think it's in everyone's interest to work this out now rather than ignore his -1 only to bump into it again when it's time to release. I realize you feel his -1 is unjustified. But simply declaring it to be so and moving on will not make the issue go away. Alan. On May 21, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > What's the official vote count? Can we move forward? > > Considering that the only -1 here has never been granted a reasonable factual > explanation, it doesn't seem like a valid -1 after all. > > Let's move forward > Cos > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:19PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I would like to put the following BOM and list of supported >>> platforms for a vote. The vote will run till noon PST on Fri >>> 5/18. Please vote by that time. >> >> The vote is now officially closed. Thanks to everybody who voted. >> >> Before I publish the final tally, though, I'd like to clarify Owen's vote >> by asking the following questions. >> >> Owen, could you, please be so kind as to answer just yes or no: >> >> 1. Are you voting against Bigtop including source code that will >> make it possible to build/deploy/validate Hue? >> >> 2. Are you voting against Bigtop publishing convenience artifacts >> that will include Hue? >> >> 3. Do you realize that #1 and #2 are fundamentally different issues? >> >> Thanks, >> Roman.
