Dear John Owen,
A union is fine if it demands no more than its fair share and no more
in an endeavor. But too often, as we see in the Autos, they have a
hammer lock on the entire Nation it would seem. But with bike
delivery, if they demand more than the truck differential-----they are
toast--caput--no bargaining power. Wouldn't you like to actually see
the thing work? Unions do not have a good track record of being
reasonable. Soon they would want what State workers were getting in
Madison. ------and then there would be a sale of mountain bikes with
trailers--cheap!-----it is that simple.
Eric
John H. Owen wrote:
I think that Aaron like myself took exception to the part "not-union".
Eric Westhagen wrote:
Dear Aaron Crandall,
It is simple. If it doesn't pay and is not flexible--it won't happen
except as a very last resort-----Is that what you want?
Eric
Aaron Crandall wrote:
What do you mean by "that would be how it should be...?"
-Aaron
From:
Eric Westhagen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected];
BikiesSubmissions <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday,
December 16, 2008 3:38:43 PM
Subject: Re:
[Bikies]
UPS gears up for holidays with bike delivery
I would expect that they save more than the fuel savings by paying the
bike people same as their Christmas temp "run to the house people."
Not permanent--not union. But that would be how it should be. That is
a flexible open market for labor. And that is good for the bicycle.
Eric
john earp wrote:
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
|
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
