I'm not affiliated with Portland Design Works, but I use their rear blinky
it has the blinky AND a reflector built together
*phew!*
I'm legal!
http://www.ridepdw.com/goods/lights/radbot%E2%84%A2-500
On 8/19/11 11:40 AM, [email protected] wrote:
What is so "bicycle UN-friendly" about requiring reflectors? I am not
aware of any good reason to drop the requirement. I would speculate that
someone favouring this step backward would dismiss the reflector as being
redundant for someone using a rear light. Well, so what if it is? If a
reflector is always on a bicycle, you have at least that much, as a backup
if nothing else, for when the light output isn't sufficient for conditions
or batteries run down.
--
Follow Wheels for Winners on FACEBOOK
<http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=734289628&v=wall&ref=profile#%21/pages/Wheels-for-Winners/168983346461729>
Read the Bike Wisconsin BLOG <http://bikewisconsin.wordpress.com>
Read Papa Wheelie's Whamblings <http://papawheelie.wordpress.com>,
Mark's creative blog
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
