I believe the issue is that the route finder does not distinguish between Level 1 and Level 2 of traffic stress, and many neighborhood streets fall under Level 2 and provide a shorter connection. If you want to contact the MPO, Dan Seidensticker and Ben Lyman would be your best contacts: [email protected] [email protected]
Harald. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:31 AM Jeffrey Schimpff via Bikies < [email protected]> wrote: > I may have missed some previous discussion of the MPO "Low Stress Bike > Route Finder," but in case it hasn't been a topic here, this GIS-based > mapping function is at: > > > https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=cb7a2e78477044c19bf6a5eaa1820e38 > > It's an interesting attempt at providing a useful service. However, when I > enter starting and destination addresses, I don't get routes that use the > bike paths. > > Does anyone know how to encourage this app to incorporate what are > generally the most low-stress route segments - our bike paths. E.g. - > enter a starting address near Farley and Kendall, and a destination like > Dorn Hardware on Midvale near the Beltline, and it avoids bike paths (as > well as the Resurrection Cemetery at the head of Farley that I often ride > through to get to the path at Glenway). > > Does anyone know how to prompt this system to do that? (I'd contact MPO > but at times it seems like work to figure out whom to contact...). > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org >
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
