Alejandro Mery wrote: > http://svn.exactcode.de/t2/trunk/package/mail/bincimap/errno.patch
This was already checked in. > http://svn.exactcode.de/t2/trunk/package/mail/bincimap/uninitialized-fix.patch I am unsure if this really makes any difference since I belive gnu c++ zero's all stack variables. But since it doesnt really change anything I commited it. > http://svn.exactcode.de/t2/trunk/package/mail/bincimap/x86-64-compile-fix.patch This on the other hand I didn't commit, I only removed the broker pointer output from the debug. Just changing this pointer from int to long might not make binc x86-64 compatible. There can still be other situations in the code where int/long's are mixed so we need to look over all the code to ensure its 64bits compatible. Thanks for supplying these patches! -- Jerry Lundström, System Developer The Division of IT and media, Stockholm University, Sweden +46 (0)8 16 19 99 / http://www.it.su.se
