bind-users  

Messages by Date

• 2008/07/28 Re: [bind] Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Mark Andrews
• 2008/07/28 Re: Multiple PTR records for one IP? Peter Laws
• 2008/07/28 RE: Bind 9.5.0-P1 WinNT version - Crashes Warren, Bob / SRC
• 2008/07/28 Re: Multiple PTR records for one IP? Dawn Connelly
• 2008/07/28 Re: nstx lucio
• 2008/07/28 Re: RR and Query Types types Howard Wilkinson
• 2008/07/28 Re: RR and Query Types types Mark Andrews
• 2008/07/28 Re: RR and Query Types types Jaap Akkerhuis
• 2008/07/28 Re: Cache Verification Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 Re: [bind] Cache Verification Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
• 2008/07/28 RR and Query Types types Howard Wilkinson
• 2008/07/28 RE: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Jeff Lightner
• 2008/07/28 Cache Verification David A. Evans
• 2008/07/28 RE: RR and Query Types types James Pratt
• 2008/07/28 BIND 9.4.3b2 crashes mschlosser-mlist
• 2008/07/28 Re: Problem with "listen-on" Michelle Konzack
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Tomasz Pajor
• 2008/07/28 BIND 9.5.1b1 on Solaris9 crash Fr34k
• 2008/07/28 RE: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Jeff Lightner
• 2008/07/28 Re: Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Mark Andrews
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Tomasz Pajor
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Tomasz Pajor
• 2008/07/28 Re: named hangs on AIX 5.3 after a few days Bob Roswell
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 Re: how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 how to setup revdns for /16 subnet Tomasz Pajor
• 2008/07/28 Re: nstx Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• 2008/07/28 named hangs on AIX 5.3 after a few days Lars-Owe . Ivarsson
• 2008/07/28 Does many dns servers around the world improve the response time? MontyRee
• 2008/07/28 Re: Bind 9.5.1b1exiting (due to assertion failure) Sotiris Tsimbonis
• 2008/07/27 Re: maximum number of FD events received in bind-9.4.3b2 Sotiris Tsimbonis
• 2008/07/27 Re: [bind] Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Brian Keefer
• 2008/07/27 Re: [bind] Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Michael Coumerilh
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Dawn Connelly
• 2008/07/27 Solaris 10 BIND 9.5.1b1-intermittent no response for root servers and nameservers Prabhat Rana
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Dawn Connelly
• 2008/07/27 Re: Too many open files Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? jbratton
• 2008/07/27 Re: Too many open files Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? jbratton
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Adam Olsen
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Adam Olsen
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Dawn Connelly
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Andy Shellam
• 2008/07/27 Re: Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Dawn Connelly
• 2008/07/27 Re: Too many open files Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? Thomas Jacob
• 2008/07/27 Re: Too many open files Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? jbratton
• 2008/07/27 Problem getting "forwarders" section in named.conf.options to work Adam Olsen
• 2008/07/27 Too many open files Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? Thomas Jacob
• 2008/07/27 Re: [bind] Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
• 2008/07/27 Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Chris Buxton
• 2008/07/26 RE: Bind 9.5.0-P1 WinNT version - Crashes Vinny Abello
• 2008/07/26 Re: statistics-channels Sten Carlsen
• 2008/07/26 Re: Increasing query port randomization under FreeBSD (?) Jeremy C. Reed
• 2008/07/26 Re: Increasing query port randomization under FreeBSD (?) Ronald F. Guilmette
• 2008/07/26 Re: statistics-channels JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• 2008/07/26 Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Stephane Bortzmeyer
• 2008/07/26 nstx lucio
• 2008/07/26 Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/26 Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Matthew Pounsett
• 2008/07/26 Re: statistics-channels Sten Carlsen
• 2008/07/26 Re: statistics-channels Andy Shellam
• 2008/07/26 Re: The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Ben Croswell
• 2008/07/26 The worst thing about the exploit -- Have you done your part? Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/26 statistics-channels Sten Carlsen
• 2008/07/26 Re: Basic Question re Security issue Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/26 Re: dns exploit Robert Spangler
• 2008/07/26 Re: DNS attacks Graeme Fowler
• 2008/07/26 Bind 9.5.0-P1 WinNT version - Crashes Radim Hajek
• 2008/07/26 Re: Bind 9.5.1b1exiting (due to assertion failure) Sotiris Tsimbonis
• 2008/07/25 Re: Basic Question re Security issue Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/25 Re: dns exploit Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/25 Re: Increasing query port randomization under FreeBSD (?) Jeremy C. Reed
• 2008/07/25 Increasing query port randomization under FreeBSD (?) Ronald F. Guilmette
• 2008/07/25 Re: mx priority question Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/07/25 Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? Jason Bratton
• 2008/07/25 Re: URGENT, PLEASE READ: 9.5.0-P1 now available Jukka Pakkanen
• 2008/07/25 Re: Deligating reverse zones. Ben Croswell
• 2008/07/25 Deligating reverse zones. James Ashton
• 2008/07/25 Re: some.public.dotted.reverse.ip.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN' denied Jeremy C. Reed
• 2008/07/25 some.public.dotted.reverse.ip.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN' denied Michael Varre
• 2008/07/25 Re: URGENT, PLEASE READ: 9.5.0-P1 now available Emery Rudolph
• 2008/07/25 Re: socket.c:4245: unexpected error: 48/Address already in use Erwin Lansing
• 2008/07/25 Re: URGENT, PLEASE READ: 9.5.0-P1 now available Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/25 Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder? Thomas Jacob
• 2008/07/25 Re: Security Patches for 8.x versions? Ian Manners
• 2008/07/25 Re: Security Patches for 8.x versions? Stacey Jonathan Marshall
• 2008/07/25 Security Patches for 8.x versions? Cherney John-CJC030
• 2008/07/25 Re: do not run old versions of bind any more please! Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/25 Re: do not run old versions of bind any more please! Paul Vixie
• 2008/07/25 Re: questions about making subdomain related with F5 Dawn Connelly
• 2008/07/25 Re: BIND 9.4.3b2 crash Dale Blount
• 2008/07/25 Re: do not run old versions of bind any more please! Bryan Irvine
• 2008/07/24 RE: questions about making subdomain related with F5 QMIN
• 2008/07/24 Re: questions about making subdomain related with F5 Kevin Darcy
• 2008/07/24 what are the meanings of these errors ? 高冲
• 2008/07/24 questions about making subdomain related with F5 QMIN
• 2008/07/24 Re: DNS exploit code is in the wild Nelson Serafica
• 2008/07/24 Re: DNS exploit code is in the wild Alan Clegg
• 2008/07/24 Re: DNS exploit code is in the wild Nelson Serafica
• 2008/07/24 Re: www.spps-serv.ch - what is going on here? Jeremy C. Reed
• 2008/07/24 Re: www.spps-serv.ch - what is going on here? Kevin Darcy
• 2008/07/24 Re: DNS exploit code is in the wild Jeremy C. Reed
• 2008/07/24 DNS exploit code is in the wild Nelson Serafica
• 2008/07/24 www.spps-serv.ch - what is going on here? Karl Auer
• 2008/07/24 Re: URGENT, PLEASE READ: 9.5.0-P1 now available Stephen John Smoogen
• 2008/07/24 Re: URGENT, PLEASE READ: 9.5.0-P1 now available JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• 2008/07/24 Re: socket.c:4245: unexpected error: 48/Address already in use JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉

• Later messages