At Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:51:51 -0500 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Sorry for the trouble. The diff was against the latest development > >code (for 9.6). I didn't thought there was a critical difference > >between the latest code and 9.5 version of rbtdb.c, but I seemed to be > >wrong. I've updated the patch and put it at the same location: > > > >http://www.jinmei.org/patch/rbtdb.c.diff > > > >Please try this one. > > I have installed the patch along with -P2 on our hidden master. > Before I installed the patch I tried "rndc dumpdb", but BIND did > not crash. I assume that the records in the cache on a hidden master > are not the type of records that cause a crash. I will install it > on our other DNS servers later this week.
This is a timing issue; if you're lucky, rndc dumpdb doesn't necessarily cause a crash. "The type of records" wouldn't matter. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
