* caio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-04]: [cut] > do not know if a connectivity problem, because i have 2 name servers, at > the same network level hierarchy (but differents subnet).., and maybe > there is one working ok while the other with failure.. > > here the case of the secondary ns...(at this moment): > > # dig @dns2.mydomain.com www.yahoo.com.ar +trace [cut] > www.yahoo.com.ar. 1800 IN CNAME hp2.latam.g1.b.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf1.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf2.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf3.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf4.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf5.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf6.yahoo.com. > g1.b.yahoo.com. 172800 IN NS yf7.yahoo.com. > ;; Received 310 bytes from 66.218.71.63#53(ns1.yahoo.com) in 233 ms > > And without "+trace" argument: > > # dig @dns2.mydomain.com www.yahoo.com.ar > > ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2 <<>> @dns2.mydomain.com www.yahoo.com.ar > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > Why with 'trace' the query seem to finish, and without 'trace' it fails?
Yes, why? I have discussed this in another thread - "Recursive queries fail if query source port is not fixed" - see <http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&s=nordhaug> I haven't followed all posts in this thread, but my problem appears only if I have random query source port - any fixed number is OK. Hans
