Vinny Abello wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Danny Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:22 PM >> To: Vinny Abello >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding >> >>> Well, that had no effect. Still seems to die pretty frequently. I >> can't easily catch and restart BIND every 30 minutes so I'm going to >> have to replace this server with a different one running an operating >> system that behaves better with BIND. I already did this on my other >> two name servers. If you have any other ideas or reasons I shouldn't >> abandon BIND on Windows, let me know while I can still test it. >>> -Vinny >>> >> It's very hard to tell. The code has been heavily stress tested to >> ensure it does not die. Are any of your address DHCP supplied or are >> they all fixed IP addresses. That could potentially have affects but I >> haven't seen that be a problem in the latest code. There will also be a >> 9.5.0-P2-W1 soon which has additional changes that may help but it's >> hard to know without seeing details. Can you file a bug report on this >> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details of your named.conf file, what you >> are >> seeing, netstat -an to see what sockets are open, vm used, handles and >> threads, CPU information and O/S and anything else that might be >> useful. >> A dump file if you have one might also be helpful if you have one and >> you can find it. > > Hi Danny, > > I know it's been heavily stress tested, and technically, it doesn't die as in > the process dying. :) But it stops responding to UDP queries. As far as my > memory goes (I'd have to recreate it again), I still see it listening on UDP > 53, but get no response. I'll have to verify that though. No DHCP is involved > at all. There is no dump file either as it's not crashing. I'll try to file a > formal bug report as I find time. Thanks! > > -Vinny
You might want to try the 9.5.0-P2-W1 version when it comes out, we I expect to be shortly. Danny
