> I wasn't pushing use of any appliance. I was saying that use of BIND on > Linux and UNIX servers was a valid way of doing things. I noted we > don't use any appliance here. I was responding to someone that seemed > to imply my suggestion of using BIND on Linux wasn't a "real world" > view. Not clear why you picked my comments rather than his to respond > to as it makes it seem you thought I was suggesting appliances were the > way to go which I most definitely was not.
i picked your comment to reply to because it was the most positive out of the thread. i myself run bind on bsd and so i'm in great fellowtravelish with you and with others who do so. but i don't want anybody here to feel that isc foresakes anybody who needs something more integrated. so i really am hoping that folks will speak up here, or contact me, if they've got needs that "BIND and DHCP out of the box" aren't meeting. (yet.)
