On 04.11.08 07:51, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > Yep, i agree with spam reduction. However, i was telling you the method > has a risk. You guy need to consider again why the SPF [RFC4408] > remained as Experimental RFC instead of Standards Track at IETF.
spam and backscatter elimination is the side-effect of SPF and DKIM. > >> Recently i'm going with DKIM [RFC4871] as an alternative technique to > >> reduce spam and phishing. DKIM is more reasonable, smooth, exact than > > > > DKIM is a joke, is it yahoo or gmail or maybe both? use that, and look > > at all the spam that comes from them. > > Well, i believe that over the long term, DKIM is win. It means that > peoples adopt reasonable things, at last ;; SPF can be implementer on the pre-data phase, DKIM needs data to be applied... however this discussion is OT here I'd say -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
