Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"

[Matthew Pounsett]

On 25-Jan-2009, at 23:06 , Barry Margolin wrote:

In article <gli8nu$ja...@sf1.isc.org>,
Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote:

In the example above, when I query for "IN A mx.xyz.com?" I do not get

an address record back (A, AAAA)..instead I get a CNAME record.
Requirements NOT met.

to follow CNAME records automatically, and return the requested record
type from the canonical name.

Then there's something wrong with your resolver, since they're supposed

You're right, of course. I was over simplifying my point, which was that the answer to the question asked is not an address record. I should probably know better than to do that. :)

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users