"In all the time its taken him to type his rants and raves and have his little
dummy spit, he could have gone and changed the MX to be a real name, ..." -
Noel Butler
Wow, such narrow mindedness.
"I like most I suspect stopped reading his rants days ago." - Noel Butler
And yet here you are continuing to proliferate the thread. Thank you!
----- Original Message -----
From: Noel Butler
To: Danny Thomas
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT
"Illegal"
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 07:43, Danny Thomas wrote:
Al Stu wrote:
> So within the zone SMTP requirements are in fact met when the
> MX RR is a CNAME.
you might argue the line of it being OK when additional processing
includes an A record.
In all the time its taken him to type his rants and raves and have his little
dummy spit, he could have gone and changed the MX to be a real name, and not
bored the rest of us because he cant read modern RFC's.
Possible courses of action
* disable the check-mx-cname in your config
As was pointed out to him days ago, but yet he persists in trolling, I like
most I suspect stopped reading his rants days ago.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
