One named and same version on both, but has a installation date august....
#ps -ef | grep named
root 137 1 0 Dec 11 ? 4297:13 /usr/local/sbin/named -c
/var/named/named.conf
/usr/local/sbin
#/usr/local/sbin/named -v
BIND 9.5.0-P2
/usr/local/sbin
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:17 PM
To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji); 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Cc: 'c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk'
Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
There may be more than one "named" binary in your path. You may want to do an
explicit reference to check the version (./named -V) or do a "which named"
----
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY
10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-
> boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 7:51 AM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Cc: c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
>
> I think you're rigth, when I check the file sizes they are not same
> but versions are matching...
>
> ----short
>
> ----------
> #ls -la
> total 48166
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root other 512 Aug 15 2008 .
> drwxr-xr-x 13 root other 512 Nov 21 14:02 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 1199932 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-keygen
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3675504 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-signzone
> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 5134128 Aug 15 2008 lwresd
> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 5134128 Aug 15 2008 named
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3816336 Aug 15 2008 named-checkconf
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3624412 Aug 15 2008 named-checkzone
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Aug 15 2008 named-compilezone
> -> named-checkzone
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 847676 Aug 15 2008 rndc
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 1136800 Aug 15 2008 rndc-confgen
> /usr/local/sbin
> #named -v
> BIND 9.5.0-P2
> /usr/local/sbin
>
> ----long----------
> [garanti2]</usr/local/sbin>ls -la
> total 158646
> drwxr-xr-x 2 bin bin 512 Nov 26 17:10 .
> drwxr-xr-x 15 root other 512 Nov 26 17:01 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3318808 Nov 26 17:10 dnssec-keygen
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 5182984 Mar 25 2004 dnssec-makekeyset
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 5184180 Mar 25 2004 dnssec-signkey
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 9997148 Nov 26 17:10 dnssec-signzone
> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 15535428 Nov 26 17:10 lwresd
> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 15535428 Nov 26 17:10 named
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 10443912 Nov 26 17:10 named-checkconf
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 9923952 Nov 26 17:10 named-checkzone
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Nov 26 17:10 named-compilezone
> -> named-checkzone
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 2917848 Nov 26 17:10 rndc
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3061584 Nov 26 17:10 rndc-confgen
> [garanti2]</usr/local/sbin>named -v
> BIND 9.5.0-P2
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Thompson [mailto:c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Chris
> Thompson
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:40 PM
> To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji)
> Cc: Bind Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
>
> On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
>
> >When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am
> >getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in
> >very short format
> >(7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per
> >dump)..What could be the difference on both? thank you
>
> Are you *sure* they are both running BIND 9.5.0-P2 ? Much the most
> likely explanation is that the one producing short statistics is a pre
> 9.5 version.
> I don't believe that BIND 9.5.x even includes any code to generate the
> old format.
>
> --
> Chris Thompson
> Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
This message and attachments are confidential and intended solely for the
individual(s) stated in this message. If you received this message although you
are not the addressee, you are responsible to keep the message confidential.
The sender has no responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the
information in the message and its attachments. Our company shall have no
liability for any changes or late receiving, loss of integrity and
confidentiality, viruses and any damages caused in anyway to your computer
system.
Bu mesaj ve ekleri, mesajda gonderildigi belirtilen kisi/kisilere ozeldir ve
gizlidir. Bu mesajin muhatabi olmamaniza ragmen tarafiniza ulasmis olmasi
halinde mesaj iceriginin gizliligi ve bu gizlilik yukumlulugune uyulmasi
zorunlulugu tarafiniz icin de soz konusudur. Mesaj ve eklerinde yer alan
bilgilerin dogrulugu ve guncelligi konusunda gonderenin ya da sirketimizin
herhangi bir sorumlulugu bulunmamaktadir. Sirketimiz mesajin ve bilgilerinin
size degisiklige ugrayarak veya gec ulasmasindan, butunlugunun ve gizliliginin
korunamamasindan, virus icermesinden ve bilgisayar sisteminize verebilecegi
herhangi bir zarardan sorumlu tutulamaz.
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
