On Apr 3, 2:49 pm, Jonathan Petersson <[email protected]> wrote: > You can use BIND itself as a load-balancer. > > What's your goal? > What's your current load? > What's your anticipated load 12 months from now? > What kind of equipment do you have available? > > /Jonathan > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Mallappa Pallakke <[email protected]> wrot= > e: > > > > > =A0Hi, > > =A0Is there any C/C++ version load balancer available? As I know we have > > lbnamed which is Perl based load balancer. > > > =A0Or can we do a kind of load balancer using any other mechanism over DN= > S? > > > =A0It will be a great help if anybody can direct be in this regard. > > > =A0Thanks, > > =A0Mallappa > > _______________________________________________ > > bind-users mailing list > > [email protected] > >https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > [email protected]https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users- > Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Using DNS, I want to do load balancing of client requests among my available servers dynamically. In realtime requirements, any/many servers among the configured me be down or overloaded. I want to have control over distribution of load to these servers. I want to have a common FQDN to the clients and they know only FQDN. I would like to have 10/20 servers handling the client requests. When ever a server goes down, all the requests (thousands) it was handling, should come to remaining available servers quickly (assume within few seconds). I feel we can use DNS for this purpose, but doing load balance in realtime? Please give me your suggession. Thanks, Mallappa Pallakke _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
