In message <96c8e9660904071112p557840a4kfd85120d7c275...@mail.gmail.com>,
Mallappa Pallakke
writes:
> Hi Mark/Kevin,
>
> I did the changes you suggested and it worked fine.
>
> Thanks a lot for all your help.
>
> Regarding round-robin load sharing instead of random, I have
> planned to have a dynamic update (nsupdate) triggered at realtime when
> ever a server goes down or comes up so that there will not be any
> possibility of putting double load on any server.
>
> My only challenge is to load the traffic on newly coming up server
> equal to other servers during high traffic. I need to do some
> controlled distribution of load (more on new server than others untill
> it comes close to other servers!).
>
> Please tell me if it has got any problem.
If you need that much control you really need something
other than named or you need a extra server. The DNS really
isn't designed to, nor is it capable of, distributing load
so precisely.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: mark_andr...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
