On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:41:04PM -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote: ... > Surely you mean sub*zone* (?) ...
Yes, Kevin. Thank you. ... > It's not always possible to arrange one's namespace between static and > dynamic, oftentimes there are other conventions and taxonomies which > dictate that "static" data and "dynamic" data must co-exist in the same > (sub)domain. This is when tools like nsupdate and the Dynamic Update > capabilities of the Net::DNS Perl module come in handy -- to allow > maintenance of "static" data in zones which also contain truly "dynamic" > data, maintained by a DHCP server and/or self-registering Wintel clients > and/or some other infrastructure component(s). ... I should have made it clear that I was speaking of the ideal. The real often has to deviate from the ideal because of other constraints. Ummm ... why Wintel specifically? There are many non-MS software components that can do this, and on many non-Intel processors. -- /*********************************************************************\ ** ** Joe Yao j...@tux.org - Joseph S. D. Yao ** \*********************************************************************/ _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
