M$ has their own take on SPF called Sender ID, which uses a very similar
record -
"v=spf2.0" rather than "v=spf1"
so be sure to read up on them both before publishing records for one or
the other.
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID
Hotmail in particular is picky about what it rejects and why.
Jeff
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:06:14PM -0400, Jeff Lightner wrote:
I'm assuming you mean it would be rejected if you didn't have an SPF
record for the company mail server in addition to the record for the
home consultancy?
In my example, you for some reason don't have control over that DNS
record. ;-) And, yes, that is what I meant, replacing "if" by
"because".
I'll look into the SPF debate - I hadn't heard suggestions NOT to use it
before - simply had never implemented it because it wasn't high
priority.
Yes.
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
