> In message <20090730141131.ga30...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:57:16PM +0200, > > JINMEI Tatuya / ???? <jin...@isc.org> wrote > > a message of 25 lines which said: > > > > > I personally don't see a need for it (what's wrong with -4/-6?) > > > > -4 shuts down any v6 service. We would like BIND to be able to *reply* > > to v6 queries without *generating* them. (For the record, I have the > > same issue than Gilles.)
On 31.07.09 00:32, Mark Andrews wrote: > Proper use of null routes will allow named to immediately detect > that a IPv6 site is not reachable. "default" is over used. oh, although it should work, it's a bit dirty workaround... it needs a statefull firewall allowing only replies to go out... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside... _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
