In message <20090731171804.b23...@gwyn.tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:32:48PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > In message <20090730174054.h23...@gwyn.tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes:
> ...
> > > Plus, I'm curious to know what 'dig -k' really wants to see.
> > 
> > A keyfile as generated by "dnssec-keygen -a HMAC-*".
> ...
> 
> Of which there are two - a .key file and a .private file.  But I never
> thought of using the .private file format!  Next week ...
> 
> > HMAC-MD5, HMAC-SHA1, HMAC-SHA224, HMAC-SHA256, HMAC-SHA384 or HMAC-SHA512.
> 
> Now, I must not have been paying attention - all my written down [or
> electronically inscribed] information says that the HMAC-MD5 algorithm
> must be used for TSIG.  When did this get opened up?

Network Working Group                                    D. Eastlake 3rd
Request for Comments: 4635                         Motorola Laboratories
Category: Standards Track                                    August 2006


                  HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers

> Thanks!
> 
> 
> -- 
> /*********************************************************************\
> **
> ** Joe Yao                            j...@tux.org - Joseph S. D. Yao
> **
> \*********************************************************************/
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to