> On Freitag 11 September 2009 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > - it's quite useless to cache the .arpa and .in-addr.arpa since > > unlike other TLD's they are hierarchically organised so there won't > > be any valuable benefit from slaving them, only risks (see above).
On 12.09.09 09:27, Michael Monnerie wrote: > Every other point is OK, but I don't understand this one. They are all > hierarchical, what's the difference with .in-addr.arpa? while there are many manual mistypes in root and other domains, there are (nearly) no mistypes in .arpa and in-addr.arpa domains since these domains are accessed by software and miskates here are unlikely to happen (of course sw can have bugs but authors would soon notice it doesn't work). -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!". _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
