> > In article <mailman.807.1290086898.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
> >  "Moore, Mark A." <mmo...@osmre.gov> wrote:
> > 
> > > I have figured out and resolved my issue.  For some reason I could not 
> > > read
> >  
> > > the contents of the db.rootcache file. So I deleted and downloaded a new 
> > > copy. Now everything is working. Thx to all for your assistance.

> In message 
> <barmar-7a12cd.21563118112...@reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated
> .example.com>, Barry Margolin writes:
> > I thought BIND now has a compiled-in set of root hints, to use as an 
> > ultimate default.  I guess this isn't used if the hints are configured 
> > but unreadable.  Perhaps you should submit this as a bug report.

On 19.11.10 14:11, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Why does it need a bug report?  If you have a hint zone in named.conf
> then falling back to the built-in hints is just plain wrong as named
> would be doing something that you have told it not to do.

I see two questions here.
- if BIND complained about unreadable hints file loudly enough
- if BIND should fallback in the case hints file can't be loaded

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released
in first quarter of year 1901
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to