* Marc Lampo: > I agree for the consequence of those "cache misses". > But doesnot that mean that RFC4035 needs amended to state : > "remove atomic entry if *all* its RRSIGs get invalid" > (because now it states : any = "at least one")
It's about the TTL on the RRSIG RRset, not the signature validity period. Conceptually, this TTL applies to the RRset as a whole, not individual records, even though on the wire, it is repeated for each record. -- Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
