In message <20110213155712.ga1...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 13.02.11 09:25, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <20110212220459.ga23...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writ > es: > > > > 2011/2/12 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>: > > > > > Is it possible to add additional zones as empty? > > > > > > On 12.02.11 11:15, Terry. wrote: > > > > depends on what is "empty". > > > > > > exactly the same what is used by disable-empty-zones option. > > > I'd like to have opposite option. > > > > zone "xxx" { > > type master; > > database "_builtin empty <nameserver> <contact>"; > > }; > > > > should do it. > > Nice, but is that documented enough so the behaviour won't change or get > removed in later releases?
It's unlikely to change. > ... and it would be nice without the <nameserver> and <contact> parts, since > they are usually defined by empty-server and empty-contact options For the zones named creates. Named isn't creating these zones. You are. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users