On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:27 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
See my other post. This is designed-in behavior for Cisco GSSes,
since there is no "service unavailable, try again later" RCODE.
Yes[0].
W
[0]: there is no "service unavailable, try again later" RCODE.....
- Kevin
On 3/1/2011 4:25 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Ring Cisco and complain that their nameservers are broken for the
zone.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 13389
;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;tools.cisco.com. IN A
;; Query time: 204 msec
;; SERVER: 72.163.4.28#53(rcdn9-14p-dcz05n-gss1.cisco.com)
;; WHEN: Wed Mar 2 08:23:59 2011
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 33
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
There are only 10 types of people in this world -- those who
understand binary arithmetic and those who don't.
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
