"missed it by THAT much ...". thx! relocating to bind-users. On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:37 -0500, "/dev/rob0" <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > FWIW I think you hit the wrong list. Did you mean bind-users@isc?
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:25:27PM -0700, dchilton+b...@bestmail.us > wrote: > > after signing my zones with 'dnssec-signzone', i 've got both > > > > dsset-domain.com > > dlvset-domain.com > > > > containing DS- and DLV-records, respectively. > > > > i know i *can* submit the records to my registrar (DS records) > > and dlv.isc.org (DLV records), but should I do both? > > > > i'm not clear if these are redundant mechs for getting to a > > 'valid' DNSSEC state, or complementary. > > > > can anyone clarify -- both or just one? and if just one, which > > one? > > [I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong.] > > My understanding: if the parent is signed, that is the only way a > child zone can be validated, unless of course using trusted-keys. > DLV is only done when the parent is unsigned. > > Off to the registrar you go! > -- > Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless > "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header > _______________________________________________ > dhcp-users mailing list > dhcp-us...@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users > _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users