"missed it by THAT much ...".  thx! relocating to bind-users.

On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:37 -0500, "/dev/rob0" <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> FWIW I think you hit the wrong list. Did you mean bind-users@isc?


> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:25:27PM -0700, dchilton+b...@bestmail.us 
>    wrote:
> > after signing my zones with 'dnssec-signzone', i 've got both 
> > 
> >  dsset-domain.com
> >  dlvset-domain.com
> > 
> > containing DS- and DLV-records, respectively.
> > 
> > i know i *can* submit the records to my registrar (DS records)
> > and dlv.isc.org (DLV records), but should I do both?
> > 
> > i'm not clear if these are redundant mechs for getting to a
> > 'valid' DNSSEC state, or complementary.
> > 
> > can anyone clarify -- both or just one? and if just one, which
> > one?
> 
> [I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong.]
> 
> My understanding: if the parent is signed, that is the only way a 
> child zone can be validated, unless of course using trusted-keys. 
> DLV is only done when the parent is unsigned.
> 
> Off to the registrar you go!
> -- 
>     Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
>     "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-us...@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
> 
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to