Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server have slow response time for the non-cached entries.
I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P2 <<>> @127.0.0.1 www.google.com +trace ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd . 2013 IN NS i.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS g.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS l.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS m.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS d.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS b.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS k.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS j.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS c.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS a.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS h.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS e.root-servers.net. . 2013 IN NS f.root-servers.net. ;; Received 228 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 1 ms com. 172800 IN NS a.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS b.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS c.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS d.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS e.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS f.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS g.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS h.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS j.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS k.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS l.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS m.gtld-servers.net. ;; Received 492 bytes from 199.7.83.42#53(l.root-servers.net) in 175 ms google.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.google.com. google.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.google.com. google.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.google.com. google.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.google.com. ;; Received 168 bytes from 192.5.6.30#53(a.gtld-servers.net) in 250 ms www.google.com. 604800 IN CNAME www.l.google.com. www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.106 www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.104 www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.147 www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.99 www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.103 www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.105 ;; Received 148 bytes from 216.239.34.10#53(ns2.google.com) in 225 ms we are running bind version "BIND 9.8.0-P2" on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) the process is running as mutlithreaded and consuming total of 60% of cpu utilization. do we have network issue or performance bottleneck. engtmk
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users