if i have several master servers, whether i must ensure that all the master
server's serial are the same? i think this is a little complex, in
particular zone is updated by dynamic update(In such a scenario, the serial
number is controled by every single bind).
is it correct?
2011/11/5 Alan Clegg <a...@clegg.com>
> On 11/5/2011 4:21 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote:
> > How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
> > might get overwritten by another?
>
> The use of the word "masters" in the configuration of a slave zone is a
> bit misleading. Under most circumstances, you list the authoritative
> servers, not "multiple masters".
>
> I have long advocated (for clarity sake) that it should be:
>
> slave example.com {
> type slave;
> authoritatives { 192.0.2.12; 203.0.113.53; };
> };
>
> instead of:
>
> slave example.com {
> type slave;
> masters { 192.0.2.12; 203.0.113.53; };
> };
>
> But that would break lots of configuration files. :)
>
> AlanC
> --
> a...@clegg.com | acl...@infoblox.com
> 1.919.355.8851
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
--
Best regards.
Felix New
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
