Hello, I know that I can use VIP with any software (corosync, Linux HA...) But this will not explain the origin of the issue I am facing :)
Even if I use a VIP I can reproduce the issue : If the first VIP (so the nameserver 1) is down, I'll have the same drawbacks. As the resolver will timeout before falling back to the second nameserver. Right ? On 9 March 2012 10:13, Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > On 03/08/2012 06:26 PM, michoski wrote: > > Meant to add one thing... In our configuration, we actually have two >> recursive VIPs per site, and even considered three (internal IPs are >> cheap). >> > > We do this. > > We also make the two different VIPs use different underlying tech - one is > an anycast route advertised with eBGP, the other is via load-balancing. The > diversity of tech gives us a bit more resilience and flexibility - taking > out the load-balancer no longer destroys DNS, for example. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Please visit > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/**listinfo/bind-users<https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/**listinfo/bind-users<https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users> > >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
