In article <[email protected]>, John Wingenbach <[email protected]> wrote:
> The concept of a "secondary" master is sound. It basically provides for > a healthy means of handling the situation where your primary master is > unusable. That's true, but the sample configurations in the OP's link did not show this. They clearly used the term "master" to refer to authoritative servers, and "secondary" in the obsolete sense of slave servers. So in the section where it showed how to configure a "secondary master", all it showed was how to configure an ordinary slave -- nothing to do with turning that slave into a replacement master. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
