> However - I guess its a little less efficient than the new default 'raw' > mode, especially for large zones. Consider a change of approach and if its > just an automated check - try 'dig'? I'm finding with in-line signing that > zones are often spread about in journal files - which makes options like > 'dig' a better way to go. Otherwise - you may have to first run 'rndc sync > -clean the.zone'.
I understand that "named-checkzone -j" will incorporate the contents of the journal file, if any. Jeff. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
