In message <d70930b5-78d5-4f33-b814-28811b885...@conundrum.com>, Matthew Pounse tt writes: > > On 2012/07/08, at 17:46, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On 07/08/2012 13:40, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > >> Yeah, I have to wonder if there's something that can be done in ports to p > revent this from being an issue. > > > > You need to ask the nice openssl people to turn gost into a library > > instead of an engine. Meanwhile, copying the file into the chroot will > > patch over the problem. > > Statically linking openssl seems to have fixed it. > > But, what file are you talking about? > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
One can also build named w/o GOST support if one wants. We statically link all the engines when building named on Windows. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
