On Oct 15 2012, [email protected] wrote:
no SOA for test.cloudns.tk IMO. see:
PromatoMacBook-Pro:~ pro$ dig test.cloudns.tk soa
; <<>> DiG 9.7.6-P1 <<>> test.cloudns.tk soa
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 60320
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;test.cloudns.tk. IN SOA
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
cloudns.tk. 300 IN SOA ns0.cloudwebdns.com.
support.cloudwebdns.com. 1048
7200 1800 604800 300
;; Query time: 860 msec
;; SERVER: 211.136.192.6#53(211.136.192.6)
;; WHEN: Mon Oct 15 21:13:04 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 96
The SOA is presented in AUTHORITY SECTION, not in ANSWER SECTION, so it's
meaningless.
Indeed, Warren's use of +nostats +ncomments to conceal that was
disingenuous, to say the least.
But you should notice that the above response - rcode NOERROR with
an empty data section - is what RFC 2308 calls "NODATA", and not an
NXDOMAIN. This is because test.cloudns.tk is an "empty non-terminal"
in the name tree within the zone, and it is that which prevents
*.cloudns.tk from applying to anything under it.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
