On 02/17/2013 12:43 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
Should I put a single entry for my /48 allocation or 16 /64 entries for
the nets I am currently using?
Both ways work.
Does it make any difference for performance?
Possibly, but I doubt you could measure it. (Unless you're using a
really ancent version of BIND, in which case the shorter list is better.)
This whole adventure is to finally get current! Well at least as
current as Redhat (actually Centos) provides :)
::1/128 ; 2001:0db8:100::4/128;
Is what you do for specific addresses?
You don't need the /128.
Nice to know that the format is consistant across address times.
thanks
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
