On Mon, Mar 18, 2013, at 03:19 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > > > Vernon Schryver writes: > > > > > to laziness, DNS is not rocket science, I'm sure given ARM and > > access to > > > > google, a 13yo kid could get at least the "basics" right. > > > > > > Laziness?--nonsense. Postel's Law and simple logic predict the > > > > truth hurts eh. > > Didn't see your original post, viewed and had to reply via Marks. > Seems your original scored 17 and was discarded > > > Mark said: > > > >The rational course would be to set a sunset date on TXT style spf > >records. April 2016 looks like a good date. 10 years after RFC > >4408 was published. > > I'd go along with that, if they can't get their act together within 3 > years, then that IS pure laziness.
Laziness can be not reading RFC6686 Appendix A: about how it is not rational to keep SPF RRTYPE99 and how things got confusing in part because of pressure from some DNS experts. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users