In message <526857a2.8050...@networktest.com>, David Newman writes: > On the surface, split DNS and DNSSEC have seemingly opposite goals: One > seeks to provide different responses to queries for the same resource, > and the other seeks to prevent it.
DNSSEC seeks to prevent *other parties* from injecting in false data. With split DNS while the data presented to different clients differs it is still true data coming from the owner of the data. Split DNS is no different to having a single zone. Updating it on every query based on the address the query came from then returning the response. > Is there some way of reconciling these? > > Thanks > > dn > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
