In message <1385060190.20266.50452509.48b1a...@webmail.messagingengine.com>, jen...@promessage.com writes: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > RRL is included in 9.9.4 already. Deployed and working here. > > as specified @ > > http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html > > ... > BIND9 9.9.4 > file rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch, version 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14 > Version 9.9.4 includes RRL with ./configure --enable-rrl so this > patch only affects RPZ. > ... > > So, that's simply a naming issue. > > IIUC, rpz2 != rpz. > > I'd applied "rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch" to 9.9.4; with success. > > So, now, I'm asking about the name- and functionally-equivalent > "rpz2+rl-9.9.4-P1.patch" for the bind 9.9.4-P1 release.
Did you try applying rpz2+rl-9.9.4-P1.patch to 9.9.4-P1? Apart from the version file it should apply cleanly and you can ignore the version file or patch it by hand if you want. I would append "-rpz2+rl.13269.14" to "RELEASEVER=1" to give "RELEASEVER=1-rpz2+rl.13269.14" which results in a full version string of "9.9.4-P1-rpz2+rl.13269.14". > JenL > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users