Mart van de Wege <mvdw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The only difference I *can* see is that this particular slave zone > occasionally gets a lot of updates in a single day, which is when this > problem seems to be triggered.
Is there an MTU problem between your slave and the master? Or a problem with fragmented UDP? I wonder if something is screwing up large IXFR packets, causing your slave to get stuck - that might explain the timeout messages in the log. It is a bit difficult to properly test IXFR because dig will only do it over TCP (it ignores the +notcp option for AXFR and IXFR). And you can't force named to use TCP for IXFR, so getting named and dig to behave the same is tricky... You could try setting "request-ixfr no;" to see if AXFR (over TCP) works better. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Shannon: Northwest 5 to 7, decreasing 4 or 5. Rough. Showers, squally at first. Good. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
