-----Original Message----- From: Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> Date: Friday, September 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM To: Mike Hoskins <micho...@cisco.com>, Thomas Schulz <sch...@adi.com>, "bind-us...@isc.org" <bind-us...@isc.org> Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
>On 9/12/14 11:07 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: >> I do have a lot of interest in the community getting to the bottom of >> this, as we are just planning a large upgrade in one of our environments >> which will move caching clusters serving 6-8k clients over to 9.10.1. > >Given all of the problems that have been reported with 9.10 you may wish >to reconsider that plan. Heh thanks, yeah...initially I was erring on the side of caution and using 9.9.x because it's served us well (~20k recursive clients without any significant problems). Meanwhile we've been keeping a close eye on community comments, and to be honest opinions wax and wane. Just as I think it's stabilized, someone else complains. I suppose sticking to 9.9.x a bit longer is wise. That said, based on the 9.10.1 fixes, we will run it through our own perf tests for comparison. Upgrades are automated and easy, but I'd obviously like to go live with the latest version unless there is a strong technical reason otherwise. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
