Yes you can run without the chroot. Years ago it was considered best practice to chroot and most power users would have said you were insane not to do so. Now there are increasingly many who say it's not worth the effort (fairly easy to get around in many cases) -- do a bit of google engineering and you will see pros/cons.
If you are using packages from your distro (looks like it from the "el6" and ancient version) this will often just be pulled in by default. If you build your own packages, use upstream repos, ISC packages or something like this: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind Then you can just install without the chroot. Entirely up to you, BIND can work either way. As I said, if you search a bit you'll find older "best practices" like these which suggest chroot (note the dates!): https://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html https://deepthought.isc.org/article/AA-00768/0/Getting-started-with-BIND-how-to-build-and-run-named-with-a-basic-recursive-configuration.html Then increasing amounts of documentation saying it is largely irrelevant due to adding minimal value due to some known issues in the chroot mechanism itself, named -u, etc: https://deepthought.isc.org/article/AA-00874/0 """ If following the preceding advice (running BIND as an unprivileged user on a dedicated server) chrooting is "de-emphasized." Our operations experts feel that chrooting does not substantially improve security under those conditions and do not affirmatively recommend it, but they do not explicitly discourage it. """ From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Harshith Mulky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 1:46 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: What is the use of having a chroot path during installation of Bind Hello, When installing bind, the following 2 are installed bind-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6.x86_64 bind-chroot-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6.x86_64 What is the need of this bind-chroot? I see all files in /var/named path are softlinks to /var/named/chroot/var/named and /etc/named.conf is softlink to /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf What is this chroot binding? And why is this chroot Binding Required? Can the named server function without this chroot Binding? Thanks Harshith
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
